Mansfield C, Sutphin J, Boeri M. Assessing the impact of excluded attributes on choice in a discrete choice experiment using a follow-up question. Health Econ. 2020 Oct;29(10):1307-15. doi: 10.1002/hec.4124
Mandeville K, Valentic M, Ivankovic D, Pristas I, Long J, Patrick H. Quality assurance of registries for health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2018;34(4):360-7.
Heidenreich S, Watson V, Ryan M, Phimister E. Decision heuristic or preference? Attribute non-attendance in discrete choice problems. Health Econ. 2018 Jan;27(1):157-71. doi: 10.1002/hec.3524
Poulos C, Kinter E, van Beek J, Christensen K, Posner J. Preferences of patients with multiple sclerosis for attributes of injectable multiple sclerosis treatments in the United Kingdom and France. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2018 Jan;34(4):425-33. doi: 10.1017/S0266462318000491
Tsuchiya A, Watson V. Re-thinking “the different perspectives that can be used when eliciting preferences in health". Health Econ. 2017 Dec;26(12):e103-7. doi: 10.1002/hec.3480
Krucien N, Watson V, Ryan M. Is best-worst scaling suitable for health state valuation? A comparison with discrete choice experiments. Health Econ. 2017 Dec;26(12):e1-e16. doi: 10.1002/hec.3459
Watson V, Becker F, de Bekker-Grob E. Discrete choice experiment response rates: a meta-analysis. Health Econ. 2017 Jun;26(6):810-7. doi: 10.1002/hec.3354
McGinley (Miller) EL, Gabbay RA. The impact of new payment methods on quality of diabetes care and outcomes. Current Diabetes Rep. 2016 Apr 18;16(51). doi: 10.1007/s11892-016-0743-5
Basarir H, Brennan A, Jacques R, Pollard D, Stevens K, Freeman J, Wales J, Price K. Cost-effectiveness of structured education in children with type-1 diabetes mellitus. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2016 Jan;32(4):203-11.
Moloney R, Mohr P, Hawe E, Shah K, Garau M, Towse A. Payer perspectives on future acceptability of comparative effectiveness and relative effectiveness research. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2015 Jan;31(1-2):90-8. doi: 10.1017/S0266462315000203
Ara R, Basarir H, Keetharuth AD, Barbieri M, Weatherly HL, Sculpher MJ, Ahmed H, Brown S. Are policy decisions on surgical procedures informed by robust economic evidence? A systematic review. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2014 Oct;30(4):381-93. doi: 10.1017/S0266462314000531
Martin-Richard M, Gallego R, Pericay C, Garcia Foncillas JG, Queralt B, Casado E, Barriuso J, Iranzo V, Juez I, Visa L, Saigi E, Barnadas A, Garcia-Albeniz X, Maurel J. Multicenter phase II study of oxaliplatin and sorafenib in advanced gastric adenocarcinoma after failure of cisplatin and fluoropyrimidine treatment. A GEMCAD study. Invest New Drugs. 2013 Dec;31(6):1573-9.
Mauskopf J, Chirila C, Masaquel C, Boye KS, Bowman L, Birt J, Grainger D. Relationship between financial impact and coverage of drugs in Australia. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2013 Jan 1;29(1):92-100.
Zarkin GA, Cowell AJ, Hicks KA, Mills MJ, Belenko S, Dunlap LJ, Houser KA, Keyes V. Benefits and costs of substance abuse treatment programs for state prison inmates: results from a lifetime simulation model. Health Econ. 2012 Jun;21(6):633-52.
Mauskopf J, Walter J, Birt J, Bowman L, Copley-Merriman C, Drummond M. Differences among formulary submission guidelines: implications for health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011 Jul 1;27(3):261-70.
Ryan M, Watson V. Comparing welfare estimates from payment card contingent valuation and discrete choice experiments. Health Econ. 2009 Apr;18(4):389-401. doi: 10.1002/hec.1364
Ryan M, Watson V, Entwistle V. Rationalising the 'irrational': a think aloud study of discrete choice experiment responses. Health Econ. 2009 Mar;18(3):321-36. doi: 10.1002/hec.1369
Zarkin GA, Dunlap LJ, Hicks KA, Mamo D. Benefits and costs of methadone treatment: results from a lifetime simulation model. Health Econ. 2005 Nov 1;14(11):1133-50.
Reed SD, Friedman JY, Gnanasakthy A, Schulman KA. Comparison of hospital costing methods in an economic evaluation of a multinational clinical trial. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2003 Mar;19(2):396-406.
Scrams DJ, McLeod LD. An expected response function approach to graphical differential item functioning. J Educ Meas. 2000 Jan 1;37(3):263-77.
Williams VSL, Rosa KR, McLeod L, Thissen D, Sanford EE. Projecting to the NAEP Scale: results from the North Carolina End‐of‐Grade Testing Program. J Educ Meas. 1998 Dec;35(4):277-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-3984.1998.tb00539.x
Williams VSL, Pommerich M, Thissen D. A comparison of developmental scales based on Thurstone methods and item response theory. J Educ Meas. 1998 Jun;35(2):93-107.
Bonfill X, Marzo M, Sentís M, Rossell M, Gallardo X, Rivero E. Evaluation of the regular practice of breast cancer screening in a health area. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1996 Apr;12(2):388-94.