Wright S, Dalal G, Vass C, Georgsson S, Payne K. How do women want to receive information about non-invasive prenatal testing? Evidence from a discrete choice experiment. Prenat Diagn. 2022 Oct;42(11):1377-89. doi: 10.1002/pd.6243
Buchanan J, Hill M, Vass CM, Hammond J, Riedijk S, Klapwijk JE, Harding E, Lou S, Vogel I, Hui L, Ingvoldstad-Malmgren C, Soller MJ, Ormond KE, Choolani M, Zheng Q, Chitty LS, Lewis C. Factors that impact on women's decision-making around prenatal genomic tests: an international discrete choice survey. Prenat Diagn. 2022 Jun;42(7):934-46. doi: 10.1002/pd.6159
Mansfield C, Sutphin J, Boeri M. Assessing the impact of excluded attributes on choice in a discrete choice experiment using a follow-up question. Health Econ. 2020 Oct;29(10):1307-15. doi: 10.1002/hec.4124
Heidenreich S, Watson V, Ryan M, Phimister E. Decision heuristic or preference? Attribute non-attendance in discrete choice problems. Health Econ. 2018 Jan;27(1):157-71. doi: 10.1002/hec.3524
Nguyen Thi Nhan P, Van Toan D, Que Huong T, Minh Nguyet D, Thanh Dao T, Minh Tri L, Khac Minh T, Hoc TP Y. 3D-pharmacophore modeling and its application on allosteric inhibitors of rac serin/threonin protein kinase AKT1. Journal of Ho Chi Minh City Pharmacy Association. 2018;22(S1):380-8.
Tsuchiya A, Watson V. Re-thinking “the different perspectives that can be used when eliciting preferences in health". Health Econ. 2017 Dec;26(12):e103-7. doi: 10.1002/hec.3480
Krucien N, Watson V, Ryan M. Is best-worst scaling suitable for health state valuation? A comparison with discrete choice experiments. Health Econ. 2017 Dec;26(12):e1-e16. doi: 10.1002/hec.3459
Watson V, Becker F, de Bekker-Grob E. Discrete choice experiment response rates: a meta-analysis. Health Econ. 2017 Jun;26(6):810-7. doi: 10.1002/hec.3354
Layton JB, Hansen MK, Jakobsen CJ, Kshirsagar AV, Andreasen JJ, Hjortdal VE, Rasmussen BS, Simpson RJ, Brookhart MA, Christiansen CF. Statin initiation and acute kidney injury following elective cardiovascular surgery: a population cohort study in Denmark. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Mar;49(3):995-1000. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezv246
Zarkin GA, Cowell AJ, Hicks KA, Mills MJ, Belenko S, Dunlap LJ, Houser KA, Keyes V. Benefits and costs of substance abuse treatment programs for state prison inmates: results from a lifetime simulation model. Health Econ. 2012 Jun;21(6):633-52.
Ryan M, Watson V. Comparing welfare estimates from payment card contingent valuation and discrete choice experiments. Health Econ. 2009 Apr;18(4):389-401. doi: 10.1002/hec.1364
Ryan M, Watson V, Entwistle V. Rationalising the 'irrational': a think aloud study of discrete choice experiment responses. Health Econ. 2009 Mar;18(3):321-36. doi: 10.1002/hec.1369
Davis KL, Joshi AV, Tortella BJ, Candrilli SD. The direct economic burden of blunt and penetrating trauma in a managed care population. J Trauma. 2007 Mar 30;62(3):622-30.
Ryan M, Diack J, Watson V, Smith N. Rapid prenatal diagnostic testing for down syndrome only or longer wait for full karyotype: the views of pregnant women. Prenat Diagn. 2005 Dec;25(13):1206-11. doi: 10.1002/pd.1309
Zarkin GA, Dunlap LJ, Hicks KA, Mamo D. Benefits and costs of methadone treatment: results from a lifetime simulation model. Health Econ. 2005 Nov 1;14(11):1133-50.