McLeod L, Bethke A, Hill C, Van Dyk P, Burling K. Development of a computerized adaptive test for a large-scale testing program: a case study of the development of the North Carolina computerized adaptive testing system. In: Howell SL, Hricko M, editors. Online assessment and measurement: case studies from higher education, K-12 and corporate. Hershey: PA. Information Science Publishing; 2006.
Droitcour J, Caspar RA, Hubbard ML, Parsley (Edwards) TL, Visscher W, Ezzati TM. The item count technique as a method of indirect questioning: a review of its development and a case study application. In: Biemer PP, Groves RM, Lyberg LE, Mathiowetz NA, Sudman S, editors. Measurement errors in surveys. New York: NY. Wiley Online Library; 2004. p.185-210. doi: 10.1002/9781118150382.ch11
Thissen D, Nelson K, Rosa K, McLeod L. Item response theory for items scored in more than two categories. In: Thissen D, Wainer H, editors. Test scoring. Hillsdale: NJ. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers; 2001.
McLeod LD, Swygert KA, Thissen D. Factor analysis for items scored in two categories. In: Thissen D, Wainer H, editors. Test scoring. Hillsdale: NJ. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers; 2001.
Swygert KA, McLeod L, Thissen D. Factor analysis for items or testlets scored in more than two categories. In: Thissen D, Wainer H, editors. Test scoring. Hillsdale: NJ. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers; 2001.
Collins, Jr FL, Britt (DiBenedetti) DM, Cohen LM, McChargue DE, Larson M, Leftwich MJT. Practitioner guidelines for the treatment of nicotine dependence. In: VandeCreek L, Jackson T, editors. Innovations in clinical practice: a source book. Sarasota: FL. Professional Resource Press; 1999. p.135-51.
Edwards TP, Suresh R, Weeks M. Automated call scheduling: current systems and practices. In: Couper MP, Baker RP, Bethlehem J, Clark CZ, Martin J, Nicholls WL, O'Reilly JM, editors. Computer assisted survey information collection. New York: NY. John Wiley & Sons; 1998. p.283-306.
Rosa K, Swygert K, Nelson LM, Thissen D. Some ideas about item response theory applied to combinations of multiple-choice and constructed-response items—scale scores for patterns of summed scores. In: Bourque ML, editors. Proceedings of achievement levels workshop. Washington: DC. National Assessment Governing Board; 1998. p.65-76.