Wright S, Dalal G, Vass C, Georgsson S, Payne K. How do women want to receive information about non-invasive prenatal testing? Evidence from a discrete choice experiment. Prenat Diagn. 2022 Oct;42(11):1377-89. doi: 10.1002/pd.6243
Buchanan J, Hill M, Vass CM, Hammond J, Riedijk S, Klapwijk JE, Harding E, Lou S, Vogel I, Hui L, Ingvoldstad-Malmgren C, Soller MJ, Ormond KE, Choolani M, Zheng Q, Chitty LS, Lewis C. Factors that impact on women's decision-making around prenatal genomic tests: an international discrete choice survey. Prenat Diagn. 2022 Jun;42(7):934-46. doi: 10.1002/pd.6159
Oser TK, Minnehan KA, Wong G, Parascando J, McGinley (Miller) E, Radico J, Oser SM. Using social media to broaden understanding of the barriers and facilitators to exercise in adults with type 1 diabetes. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2019 May;13(3):457-65. doi: 10.1177/1932296819835787
Wolowacz SE, Petrillo J, Doward LC, Briggs A. Measuring health-state utility values in clinical trials: can we do better? Ispor Connections. 2014 Sep;20(5):4-8.
Stull DE, Houghton KF, Petrillo J. Innovative data analysis for demonstrating product value: analysis of heterogeneity in treatment response in clinical trials. Ispor Connections. 2013;19(1):5-8.
Masters E, Zlateva G, Harris NI. Real-world data for use in the real world: the pain paradigm. Ispor Connections. 2013;19(2):9-11.
Wolowacz SE, Khan SB. The New National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) Single Technology Appraisal (STA) process: experience from the first completed appraisals. Ispor Connections. 2007;13(2):12-5.
Ryan M, Diack J, Watson V, Smith N. Rapid prenatal diagnostic testing for down syndrome only or longer wait for full karyotype: the views of pregnant women. Prenat Diagn. 2005 Dec;25(13):1206-11. doi: 10.1002/pd.1309
Mansfield CA. A consistent method for calibrating contingent value survey data. South Econ J. 1998;64(3):665-81.