Clinch S, McDougall F, Barrett A, Olayinka-Amao B, Craveiro L, Baker M, Lindemann M. A patient-focused qualitative study to support content validity of digital performance assessments in MS. Poster presented at the 2021 ECTRIMS Annual Congress; October 13, 2021. [abstract] Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2021 Oct 21; 27(2 Suppl):329. doi: 10.1177/13524585211044667
Janssens R, Lang T, Vallejo A, Galinsky J, Plate A, Morgan K, Cabezudo E, Silvennoinen R, Coriu D, Badelita S, Irimia R, Anttonen M, Manninen RL, Schoefs E, Vandebroek M, Vanhellemont A, Delforge M, Stevens H, Simoens S, Huys I. Patient preferences for multiple myeloma treatments: a multinational qualitative study. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Jul 6;8:686165. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.686165
Mansfield C, Sutphin J, Boeri M. Assessing the impact of excluded attributes on choice in a discrete choice experiment using a follow-up question. Health Econ. 2020 Oct;29(10):1307-15. doi: 10.1002/hec.4124
Poulos C, Wakeford C, Kinter E, Mange B, Schenk T, Jhaveri M. Patient and physician preferences for multiple sclerosis treatments in Germany: a discrete-choice experiment study. Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2020 Jan;9(2):1-14. doi: 10.1177/2055217320910778
Heidenreich S, Watson V, Ryan M, Phimister E. Decision heuristic or preference? Attribute non-attendance in discrete choice problems. Health Econ. 2018 Jan;27(1):157-71. doi: 10.1002/hec.3524
Tsuchiya A, Watson V. Re-thinking “the different perspectives that can be used when eliciting preferences in health". Health Econ. 2017 Dec;26(12):e103-7. doi: 10.1002/hec.3480
Krucien N, Watson V, Ryan M. Is best-worst scaling suitable for health state valuation? A comparison with discrete choice experiments. Health Econ. 2017 Dec;26(12):e1-e16. doi: 10.1002/hec.3459
Watson V, Becker F, de Bekker-Grob E. Discrete choice experiment response rates: a meta-analysis. Health Econ. 2017 Jun;26(6):810-7. doi: 10.1002/hec.3354
Zarkin GA, Cowell AJ, Hicks KA, Mills MJ, Belenko S, Dunlap LJ, Houser KA, Keyes V. Benefits and costs of substance abuse treatment programs for state prison inmates: results from a lifetime simulation model. Health Econ. 2012 Jun;21(6):633-52.
Ryan M, Watson V. Comparing welfare estimates from payment card contingent valuation and discrete choice experiments. Health Econ. 2009 Apr;18(4):389-401. doi: 10.1002/hec.1364
Ryan M, Watson V, Entwistle V. Rationalising the 'irrational': a think aloud study of discrete choice experiment responses. Health Econ. 2009 Mar;18(3):321-36. doi: 10.1002/hec.1369
Zarkin GA, Dunlap LJ, Hicks KA, Mamo D. Benefits and costs of methadone treatment: results from a lifetime simulation model. Health Econ. 2005 Nov 1;14(11):1133-50.
Kjeldsen BJ, Thorsen H, Whalley D, Kronborg O. Influence of follow-up on health-related quality of life after radical surgery for colorectal cancer. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1999 May;34(5):509-15.