Publications

Search our bibliography using the filters on the right-hand side.

Displaying 201 through 250 of 372 publications.

Vass C, Davison N, Payne K. The role of training materials in healthcare stated preference studies: improved response efficiency? Presented at the 2018 Society for Medical Decision Making (SMDM) 17th Biennial European Meeting; June 12, 2018. Lieden, The Netherlands.

Vass CM, Wright S, Burton M, Payne K. Scale heterogeneity in healthcare discrete choice experiments: a primer. Patient. 2018 Apr;11(2):167-73. doi: 10.1007/s40271-017-0282-4

Poulos C, Curran D, Anastassopoulou A, De Moerlooze L. German travelers' preferences for travel vaccines assessed by a discrete choice experiment. Vaccine. 2018 Feb 8;36(7):969-78.

Vass C, Rigby D, Payne K. Investigating the heterogeneity in women's preferences for breast screening: does the communication of risk matter? Value Health. 2018 Feb;21(2018):219-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.07.010

Cunningham NA, Abhyankar P, Cowie J, Galinksy J, Methven K. Regenerative medicine: stroke survivor and carer views and motivations towards a proposed stem cell clinical trial using placebo neurosurgery. Health Expect. 2018 Feb;21(1):367-78. doi: 10.1111/hex.12632

Ikenwilo D, Heidenreich S, Ryan M, Mankowski C, Nazir J, Watson V. The best of both worlds: an example mixed methods approach to understand men's preferences for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms. Patient. 2018 Feb;11(1):55-67. doi: 10.1007/s40271-017-0263-7

Heidenreich S, Watson V, Ryan M, Phimister E. Decision heuristic or preference? Attribute non-attendance in discrete choice problems. Health Econ. 2018 Jan;27(1):157-71. doi: 10.1002/hec.3524

Poulos C, Kinter E, van Beek J, Christensen K, Posner J. Preferences of patients with multiple sclerosis for attributes of injectable multiple sclerosis treatments in the United Kingdom and France. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2018 Jan;34(4):425-33. doi: 10.1017/S0266462318000491

Hauber AB, Mange B, Price MA, Wolin D, Bensink M, Kaye JA, Chandler D. Administration options for pegfilgrastim prophylaxis: patient and physician preferences from a cross-sectional survey. Support Care Cancer. 2018 Jan;26(1):251-60. doi: 10.1007/s00520-017-3841-2

Postmus D, Richard S, Bere N, van Valkenhoef G, Galinsky J, Low E, Moulon I, Mavris M, Salmonsson T, Flores B, Hillege H, Pignatti F. Individual trade‐offs between possible benefits and risks of cancer treatments: results from a stated preference study with patients with multiple myeloma. Oncologist. 2018 Jan;23(1):44-51. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0257

Tsuchiya A, Watson V. Re-thinking “the different perspectives that can be used when eliciting preferences in health". Health Econ. 2017 Dec;26(12):e103-7. doi: 10.1002/hec.3480

Krucien N, Watson V, Ryan M. Is best-worst scaling suitable for health state valuation? A comparison with discrete choice experiments. Health Econ. 2017 Dec;26(12):e1-e16. doi: 10.1002/hec.3459

Mansfield C, Sikirica MV, Pugh A, Poulos CM, Unmuessig V, Morano R, Martin AA. Patient preferences for attributes of type 2 diabetes mellitus medications in Germany and Spain: an online discrete-choice experiment survey. Diabetes Ther. 2017 Dec;8(6):1365-78. doi: 10.1007/s13300-017-0326-8

Hifinger M, Hiligsmann M, Ramiro S, Watson V, Berghea F, Pentek M, Keat A, Severens JL, Fautrel B, Boonen A. Influence of disease activity on RA treatment choices in countries with restricted access to expensive, innovative drugs: a discrete choice experiment among rheumatologists. RMD open. 2017 Sep 4;3(2):E000453. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2017-000453

Hauber AB, Obi EN, Price MA, Whalley D, Chang CL. Quantifying the relative importance to patients of avoiding symptoms and outcomes of heart failure. Curr Med Res Opin. 2017 Sep;33(11):2027-38. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2017.1355782

Vass CM, Payne K. Using discrete choice experiments to inform the benefit-risk assessment of medicines: are we ready yet? Pharmacoeconomics. 2017 Sep;35(9):859-66. doi: 10.1007/s40273-017-0518-0.

Cleland JA, Johnston P, Watson V, Krucien N, Skatun D. What do UK medical students value most in their careers? A discrete choice experiment. Med Educ. 2017 Aug;51(8):839-51. doi: 10.1111/medu.13257

Mansfield C, Bullok KE, Fuhs JV, Kahle-Wrobleski K, Tockhorn-Heidenreich A, Andrews JS, DiBenedetti DB, Matthews BR, Darling JC, Siemers ER, Hauber AB. The patient voice: exploring treatment preferences in participants with mild cognitive concerns to inform regulatory decision-making. Poster presented at the 2017 Alzheimer’s Association International Conference; July 19, 2017. London, United Kingdom.

Hiligsmann M, Dellaert BG, Dirksen CD, Watson V, Bours S, Goemaere S, Reginster JY, Roux C, McGowan B, Silke C, Whelan B, Diez-Perez A, Torres E, Papadakis G, Rizzoli R, Cooper C, Pearson G, Boonen A. Patients' preferences for anti-osteoporosis drug treatment: a cross-European discrete choice experiment. Rheumatology. 2017 Jul 1;56(7):1167-76. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kex071

Watson V, Becker F, de Bekker-Grob E. Discrete choice experiment response rates: a meta-analysis. Health Econ. 2017 Jun;26(6):810-7. doi: 10.1002/hec.3354

Myers K, McNair D, Tomasi T, Schneider J. Assessing the validity of stated preference data using follow-up questions.. In: McFadden D, Train K, editors. Contingent valuation of environmental goods: a comprehensive critique. Northampton: MA. Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc; 2017. p.252-69. doi: 10.4337/9781786434692

Myers K, Parsons G, Train K. Inadequate response to frequency of payments in contingent valuation of environmental goods. In: McFadden D, Train K, editors. Contingent valuation of environmental goods: a comprehensive critique. Northampton: MA. Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc; 2017. p.43-57. doi: 10.4337/9781786434692

Parsons G, Myers K. Fat tails and truncated bids in contingent valuation: an application to an endangered shorebird species. In: McFadden D, Train K, editors. Contingent valuation of environmental goods: a comprehensive critique. Northampton: MA. Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc; 2017. p.17-42. doi: 10.4337/9781786434692

Vass C, Rigby D, Payne K. The role of qualitative research methods in discrete choice experiments. Med Decis Making. 2017 Apr;37(3):298-313. doi: 10.1177/0272989X16683934

Hifinger M, Hiligsmann M, Ramiro S, Watson V, Severens JL, Fautrel B, Uhlig T, van Vollenhoven R, Jacques P, Detert J, Canas da Silva J, Scire CA, Berghea F, Carmona L, Pentek M, Keat A, Boonen A. Economic considerations and patients' preferences affect treatment selection for patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a discrete choice experiment among European rheumatologists. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Jan;76(1):126-32. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209202

Hifinger M, Hiligsmann M, Ramiro S, Severens JL, Fautrel B, Watson V, Boonen A. Patient's preferences and economic considerations play an important role in treatment decisions: a discrete choice experiment among rheumatologists. Rheumatology. 2017 Jan;56(1):68-76. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kew328

Mankowski C, Ikenwilo D, Heidenreich S, Ryan M, Nazir J, Newman C, Watson V. Men's preferences for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia: a discrete choice experiment. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2016 Nov 24;10:2407-17. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S112161

Poulos C, Curran D, Anastassopoulou A, De Moerlooze L. German travelers' preferences for vaccines against travel-related illnesses. Poster presented at the 2016 ISPOR 19th Annual European Congress; October 31, 2016. Vienna, Austria. [abstract] Value Health. 2016 Nov; 19(7):A419-20.

Poulos C, Standaert B, Sloesen B, Hauber AB. What motivates mothers to pay for a vaccine against children's diarrhea? Preferences for vaccines against children's diarrheal illness among mothers in Poland and Hungary. Poster presented at the 2016 ISPOR 19th Annual European Congress; October 31, 2016. Vienna, Austria. [abstract] Value Health. 2016 Nov; 19(7):A419.

Kenter JO, Bryce R, Christie M, Cooper N, Hockley N, Irvine KN, Fazey I, O'Brien L, Orchard-Webb J, Ravenscroft N, Raymond CM, Reed MS, Tett P, Watson V. Shared values and deliberative valuation: future directions. Ecosyst Serv. 2016 Oct;21(Part B):358-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.10.006

Kenter JO, Jobstvogt N, Watson V, Irvine KN, Chrisstie M, Bryce R. The impact of information, value-deliberation and group-based decision-making on values for ecosystem services: integrating deliberative monetary valuation and storytelling. Ecosyst Serv. 2016 Oct;21(Part B):270-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.06.006

Mamounas E, Poulos C, Goertz HP, Gonzalez JM, Pugh A, Antao V. Neoadjuvant systemic therapy for breast cancer: factors influencing surgeons' referrals. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Oct;23(11):3510-7. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5296-y

Hauber AB, Obi EN, Price MA, Whalley D, Chang CL. Patients' self-reported value of avoiding key heart failure outcomes differs based on disease knowledge. Poster presented at the 2016 HFSA 20th Annual Scientific Meeting; September 17, 2016. Orlando, FL.

Galinksy J, Richard S, Morris M. Myeloma patients' self-reported experiences of care and treatment. Cancer Nurs Pract. 2016 Sep 14;15(7):22-6. doi: 10.7748/cnp.2016.e1341

Wakefield JR, Myers K. Social cost benefit analysis for deep sea minerals mining. Mar Policy. 2016 Jun 22. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2016.06.018

Vass C, Gray E, Payne K. Discrete choice experiments of pharmacy services: a systematic review. Int J Clin Phar. 2016 Jun;38(3):620-30. doi: 10.1007/s11096-015-0221-1

Vass CM, Payne K. What is health economics? Problematising value in stratified medicine. Presented at the Value, Context and Narrative in Medical Epistemology and Health Care Practice Conference; May 4, 2016. Oxford, United Kingdom.

Poulos C. A review of discrete choice experiment studies of preferences for vaccine features. Poster presented at the 2016 ISPOR 21st Annual International Meeting; May 24, 2016. Washington, DC. [abstract] Value Health. 2016 May; 19(3):A220.

Gray E, Eden M, Vass C, McAllister M, Louviere J, Payne K. Valuing preferences for the process and outcomes of clinical genetics services: a pilot study. Patient. 2016 Apr;9(2):135-47. doi: 10.1007/s40271-015-0133-0

Poulos C, Kinter E, Yang J-C, Bridges JFP, Posner JD, Reder AT. Patient preferences for injectable treatments for multiple sclerosis in the United States: a discrete-choice experiment. Patient. 2016 Apr;9(2):171-80. doi: 10.1007/s40271-015-0136-x

Porteous T, Ryan M, Bond C, Watson M, Watson V. Managing minor ailments; the public's preferences for attributes of community pharmacies. A discrete choice experiment. PLoS One. 2016 Mar 31;11(3):e0152257. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152257

Poulos C, Kinter E, Yang JC, Bridges JF, Posner J, Gleibner E, Muhlbacher A, Kieseier B. A discrete-choice experiment to determine patient preferences for injectable multiple sclerosis treatments in Germany. Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2016 Mar;9(2):95-104. doi: 10.1177/1756285615622736.

Cleland J, Johnston P, Watson V, Krucien N, Skatun D. What do UK doctors in training value in a post? A discrete choice experiment. Med Educ. 2016 Feb;50(2):189-202. doi: 10.1111/medu.12896

Dickey H, Ikenwilo D, Norwood P, Watson V, Zangelidis A. "Doctor my eyes": a natural experiment on the demand for eye care services. Soc Sci Med. 2016 Feb;150:117-27. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.12.037

Wald JS, Vishwanath NS, Shrestha M, Poulos C, Simon L, Vijayakumar G. Supporting diabetes medication understanding and adherence through a health literacy intervention, Meducation, in Kerala, India. In: LaBresh K, editors. Improving outcomes for noncommunicable diseases in low- and middle-income countries. Publication No. Bk-0017-1608 ed. Research Triangle Park: NC. RTI Press Publication; 2016. p.61-78. doi: 10.3768/rtipress.2016.bk.0017.1608

Cooley P, Rogers SM, Poulos C, Scruggs MD, Rineer JI, Wheaton WD, Allaire BT, Wagener DK. Microsimulation models to assess impact of health programs to address obesity and low birth weight in Indonesia. In: K. LaBresh, editors. Improving outcomes for noncommunicable diseases in low- and middle-income countries. Publication No. Bk-0017-1608 ed. Research Triangle Park: NC. RTI Press Publication; 2016. p.35-60. doi: 10.3768/rtipress.2016.bk.0017.1608

Poulos C, Kinter E, Posner J, van Beek J. A comparison of stated preferences for injectable disease-modifying treatments for multiple sclerosis: compliant vs. non-compliant patients. Poster presented at the 2015 ISPOR 18th Annual European Congress; November 2015. Milan, Italy.

Mansfield CA, Sikirica M, Pugh A, Poulos C, Martin AA, Ruiz Moran L, Morano Larragueta R. Patient preferences for attributes of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) treatments in Spain. Poster presented at the 2015 ISPOR 18th Annual European Congress; November 2015. Milan, Italy.

Vass C, Rigby D, Campbell S, Payne K. Investigating the framing-effects of risk attributes in a discrete choice experiment for a national breast screening programme. Presented at the 37th Annual Meeting of the Society for Medical Decision Making (SMDM); October 19, 2015. St. Louis, MO.

Vass C, Rigby D, Campbell S, Tate K, Stewart A, Payne K. Using eye-tracking methods to investigate the framing of risk attributes in discrete choice experiments. Poster presented at the 37th Annual Meeting of the Society for Medical Decision Making (SMDM); October 18, 2015. St. Louis, MO.