INTRODUCTION: To quantify patients' preferences for adjuvant renal cell carcinoma (RCC) treatments.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Preferences were elicited using a discrete-choice experiment requiring RCC patients to choose between 2 hypothetical treatments. Data were analyzed using random-parameters logit and latent-class models.
RESULTS: Patients (n = 250) preferred treatments that increase disease-free and overall survival (OS), are taken less frequently, require no concomitant medication, have a shorter duration, and have lower side-effect risks. The analyses also highlighted their willingness to make tradeoffs between these benefits and risks. Patients were generally tolerant of increases in the risks of treatment-related severe diarrhea, dizziness, and fatigue and were willing to accept increases in these risks in exchange for improvements in overall or disease-free survival. Latent-class analysis identified 3 classes: class 1 (37.5%) and class 2 (26.9%) preferred not to opt out of treatment and prioritized increased OS and disease-free survival, respectively; class 3 (35.5%) preferred to opt out and prioritized mode, duration, and risks.
CONCLUSIONS: Heterogeneity suggests patient-physician discussions are important when considering RCC treatments.
Calhoun SR, Vass C, Myers K, Imai K, Bussberg C, Bhattacharya R, Pinto CA, Poulos C. Patient preferences for adjuvant therapy in renal cell carcinoma: a discrete-choice experiment. Future Oncol. 2025 Mar;21(7):843-51. doi: 10.1080/14796694.2025.2463276
Related Therapeutic Areas